Metropolitan Digital

Men's Weekly


.

What’s next after Supreme Court curbs regulatory power: More focus on laws’ wording, less on their goals

  • Written by Robin Kundis Craig, Professor of Law, University of Kansas
What’s next after Supreme Court curbs regulatory power: More focus on laws’ wording, less on their goalsTwo fishing companies challenged regulations that required Atlantic herring fishers to pay some costs for observers on their boats.Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Federal Chevron deference is dead. On June 28, 2024, in a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court overturned the 40-year-old legal tenet that when a federal statute is silent or ambiguous about a particular...

Read more: What’s next after Supreme Court curbs regulatory power: More focus on laws’ wording, less on their...

More Articles ...

  1. 5 questions after the NCAA’s $2.75B settlement to pay college athletes
  2. Black economic boycotts of the civil rights era still offer lessons on how to achieve a just society
  3. Loss of Supreme Court legitimacy can lead to political violence
  4. US’s terrorist listing of European far-right group signals fears of rising threat − both abroad and at home
  5. Knowing when to call it quits takes courage and confidence - 3 case studies
  6. Supreme Court rules cities can ban homeless people from sleeping outdoors – Sotomayor dissent summarizes opinion as ‘stay awake or be arrested’
  7. How camping bans − like the one the Supreme Court just upheld − can fit into ‘hostile design’: Strategies to push out homeless people
  8. Supreme Court makes prosecution of Trump on obstruction charge more difficult, with ruling to narrowly define law used against him and Jan. 6 rioters
  9. ICE detainees suffer preventable deaths − Q A with a medical researcher about systemic failures
  10. Federal funding for major science agencies is at a 25-year low
Metropolitan republishes selected articles from The Conversation USA with permission

Visit The Conversation to see more