When the Obama administration launched the Second Chance Pell program in 2016, the idea was to provide incarcerated people the chance to get a college education despite a longstanding congressional ban on Pell Grants for people serving time.
That’s one reason why, on July 30, 2021, the U.S. Department of Education announced that it would be expanding the Second Chance Pell Experimental Sites Initiative. Higher education institutions can apply to be considered for the 2022-23 academic year.
Specifically, the number of colleges and universities providing higher education under Second Chance Pell will reach 200. That’s significantly more than the 130 sites operating in 42 states and the District of Columbia as of 2020.
As someone who studies correctional education and prisoner reentry, I see this expanded access to higher education in prison as something that will bring many benefits to not only the incarcerated individuals who get an education but to society as well.
Even before Second Chance Pell, prison education had already been proved as an effective way to prevent crime.
A commonly cited 2013 RAND Corporation study found that those who participate in prison education were 43% less likely to re-offend when released. In 2018, the RAND Corporation expanded their research and found that the impact was even greater – with prison education participants 48% less likely to re-offend.
If re-offense rates remain low as Second Chance Pell expands, states would likely begin to spend less taxpayer money on prison costs. A 2019 cost savings analysis by Georgetown University projected that states would save over US$300 million a year because of lower re-offense rates among Second Chance Pell participants.
People who participate in education programs in prison are 13% more likely to get jobs upon release than those who do not participate. The unemployment rate for someone with a bachelor’s degree is 3.7% compared with 6.7% for someone with a high school diploma or equivalent.
And the annual earnings are nearly 70% higher at roughly $64,900 for someone with a bachelor’s degree versus about $38,800 for someone with only a high school diploma.
This suggests that the higher the level of education a person gets while incarcerated, the more likely they are to find work and pay taxes upon release.
There has been no large-scale study to test whether Second Chance Pell participation reduces re-offending and improves employment outcomes. However, a 2021 report shows that the first four years of the Second Chance Pell experiment yielded participation from 22,000 students, with 7,000 credentials awarded, including 3,499 certificates, 3,035 associate degrees and 540 bachelor degrees.
This willingness is likely to increase once the federal ban on Pell Grants to incarcerated students is fully lifted in 2023. These developments also come at a time when states are investing in opportunities to provide more higher education to people in prison as a way to improve their social and economic mobility when released.
- ^ launched the Second Chance Pell program in 2016 (www.nasfaa.org)
- ^ longstanding congressional ban (www.politico.com)
- ^ US$6,495 for the 2021–22 school year (studentaid.gov)
- ^ Congress ended the federal ban in 2020 (www.insidehighered.com)
- ^ announced that it would be expanding (www.ed.gov)
- ^ reach 200 (www.ed.gov)
- ^ 130 sites (www.vera.org)
- ^ correctional education (books.google.com)
- ^ prisoner reentry (doi.org)
- ^ RAND Corporation study (www.rand.org)
- ^ expanded their research (www.rand.org)
- ^ 2019 cost savings analysis (www.vera.org)
- ^ more likely to get jobs (www.rand.org)
- ^ unemployment rate (www.bls.gov)
- ^ $64,900 for someone with a bachelor’s degree versus about $38,800 for someone with only a high school diploma (www.northeastern.edu)
- ^ 22,000 students, with 7,000 credentials awarded (www.vera.org)
- ^ college enrollments (www.forbes.com)
- ^ increase revenue (www.usatoday.com)
- ^ states are investing in opportunities (californiacompetes.org)
- ^ Sign up for The Conversation’s daily newsletter (theconversation.com)
Authors: Andrea Cantora, Associate Professor of Criminal Justice, University of Baltimore