Metro

  • Written by Austin Sarat, Associate Provost and Associate Dean of the Faculty and Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science, Amherst College

Throughout American history judges have generally tried[1] to avoid getting involved in political questions, including litigation about elections. They followed Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter’s famous advice[2] to avoid “embroilment” in “the political thicket” of “party contests and party interests.”

This tradition began to erode[3] in the 1960s, when courts took up cases involving legislative redistricting and gerrymandering[4]. And since the Supreme Court’s 2000 Bush v. Gore[5] decision, which effectively decided that year’s presidential election, political parties have increasingly turned to the courts in search of electoral advantage.

A portrait of Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter. Courts ought not enter ‘the political thicket,’ Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter cautioned. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution[6]

Prior to 2000, an average of 96 election law cases were[7] brought every year in state and federal courts. By 2004, that average jumped to 254, most of them filed at the state level.

This year, the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project reports[8] that as of Oct. 15, 365 such cases have been filed in 44 states.

Many of those cases arise from state efforts to respond to the difficulties of campaigning and voting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Democrats generally have supported efforts to making voting easier[9], such as in Michigan, where they were successful[10] in getting the courts to extend the period during which late-arriving mail ballots could be legally counted. Republicans generally have opposed those efforts.

When the voting happens

This year’s election-related litigation began to emerge in the spring as states tried to cope with the pandemic’s first wave during the political primary season.

Those cases fell into two major categories. Some were filed to try to change the date when people voted in presidential primaries. Others focused on how people voted in those primaries and the general election.

Sixteen states changed[11] the dates of their primaries, and most did so without resorting to litigation.

Nonetheless, some states faced lawsuits over the timing of presidential primaries, filed by political candidates and public officials, including in New York and Wisconsin.

A picture of Andrew Yang speaking into a microphone. Former presidential candidate Andrew Yang was involved in election-related litigation regarding the Democratic presidential primary in New York. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images News via Getty Images[12]

In April, Andrew Yang, then a Democratic presidential candidate, sued[13] the New York State Board of Elections after it effectively canceled the Democratic presidential primary. He argued that doing so was illegal since he already had met the requirements for having his name to appear on the ballot. One month after the suit was filed, a judge agreed with Yang and ordered[14] the state to proceed with its presidential primary.

Wisconsin proved to be a particularly fertile ground for litigation over its April primary. In one case, the Wisconsin legislature prevailed in challenging[15] the governor’s executive order postponing in-person voting.

In another Wisconsin case, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the Republican National Committee and the state party when it blocked[16] a plan to extend the period to return absentee ballots in the primary election.

How the voting happens

In cases concerning the ways people could vote, Democrats in Kansas sued[17] to force Secretary of State Scott Schwab to implement a law permitting voters to cast ballots from any polling station within their home county. Schwab argued that the complexity of developing necessary administrative regulations prevented him from doing do so in time for this year’s election.

A state court judge dismissed the suit but said that county officials could, if they wished, implement the Kansas Vote Anywhere Act[18] on their own without waiting for the state to act.

In Ohio, a federal judge also dismissed[19] an American Civil Liberties Union suit seeking to extend the deadline for absentee voting for the state’s presidential primary and move from in-person to universal mail balloting. The plaintiffs claimed that the state’s inefficient absentee-voting system would disenfranchise people through no fault of their own unless the deadline was changed and that in-person voting during the pandemic would pose a health risk.

Focus on mail-in ballots

Many of this year’s election-related cases have focused[20] specifically on mail-in ballots. This is not surprising given President Donald Trump’s well-publicized but baseless[21] attacks[22] on voting by mail.

Some of this litigation has been brought to expand[23] opportunities to cast that kind of ballot or to ease the requirements for doing so. Other cases have been filed[24] by groups opposing such changes and raising concerns about voter fraud.

Recent rulings in some of those cases have made voting by mail more difficult; others have made it easier.

In the first category, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled[25] on Oct. 5 that South Carolina could require people voting by mail to have another person sign their ballot as a witness. However, over the objection of Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, the court declined to invalidate the more than 20,000 ballots that had been cast prior to its ruling.

Three days later, in a victory for Wisconsin’s Republican Party, a federal appeals court upheld[26] that state’s requirement that in order to be counted, mail-in ballots must be in the hands of election officials by 8 p.m. on Election Day.

But, also on October 8, Justice Elena Kagan turned down[27] a request from Montana Republicans to block some counties from proactively mailing ballots to voters starting the next day.

In another victory for supporters of mail balloting, a federal judge in Pennsylvania dismissed[28] a lawsuit filed by the Trump campaign seeking, among other things, to block the use of drop boxes as receptacles for mail ballots.

Full employment for election lawyers

November 3 is unlikely to end[29] litigation to resolve election-related disputes. In fact, both the Biden[30] and Trump[31] campaigns have assembled armies of lawyers who will be ready to bring lawsuits in the election’s aftermath.

President Trump already has indicated[32] that he expects the Supreme Court to again resolve a contested presidential election.

For someone who studies[33] the complex intersections of politics and law, the use of litigation to resolve electoral disputes that we are seeing this year is a reminder of what the famous French aristocrat and author Alexis de Tocqueville observed[34] early in the 19th century: namely, that “Scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question.”

A white sign with red text that says 'Every Vote Counts.' Every vote counts – but what does it mean when election results go to court? Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images[35]

Nonetheless, when courts and judges take sides in cases that shape the outcome of a hotly contested election, they open themselves up, as Frankfurter warned, to charges[36] that they are making purely partisan decisions rather than strictly following the law. That is why public confidence in the Supreme Court took a hit[37] in the aftermath of its Bush v. Gore decision.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter[38].]

Whatever decisions judges make this year, the rush to the courthouse to shape the 2020 election will pose real challenges for their legitimacy, which ultimately depends[39] on the public’s belief that they are not simply political actors.

And if the Supreme Court again decides who becomes president, it may further weaken its already diminished standing[40] with the American public and deepen the divide in an already dangerously polarized nation.

References

  1. ^ tried (digitalcommons.law.yale.edu)
  2. ^ advice (www.law.cornell.edu)
  3. ^ erode (www.electionlawissues.org)
  4. ^ legislative redistricting and gerrymandering (www.ncsl.org)
  5. ^ Bush v. Gore (supreme.justia.com)
  6. ^ National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution (npg.si.edu)
  7. ^ were (www.electionlawissues.org)
  8. ^ Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project reports (healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu)
  9. ^ making voting easier (www.npr.org)
  10. ^ were successful (www.reuters.com)
  11. ^ changed (www.nytimes.com)
  12. ^ Justin Sullivan/Getty Images News via Getty Images (www.gettyimages.com)
  13. ^ sued (www.documentcloud.org)
  14. ^ ordered (www.politico.com)
  15. ^ challenging (www.washingtonpost.com)
  16. ^ blocked (www.cnn.com)
  17. ^ sued (hayspost.com)
  18. ^ Vote Anywhere Act (www.kake.com)
  19. ^ dismissed (www.jurist.org)
  20. ^ have focused (www.brennancenter.org)
  21. ^ but baseless (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ attacks (www.npr.org)
  23. ^ expand (apnews.com)
  24. ^ filed (www.chicagotribune.com)
  25. ^ ruled (www.supremecourt.gov)
  26. ^ upheld (www.wpr.org)
  27. ^ turned down (www.cnn.com)
  28. ^ dismissed (www.washingtonpost.com)
  29. ^ unlikely to end (prospect.org)
  30. ^ Biden (www.nytimes.com)
  31. ^ Trump (www.politico.com)
  32. ^ indicated (www.nytimes.com)
  33. ^ studies (www.sup.org)
  34. ^ observed (xroads.virginia.edu)
  35. ^ Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images (www.gettyimages.com)
  36. ^ charges (yale.universitypressscholarship.com)
  37. ^ took a hit (www.democracy.uci.edu)
  38. ^ Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter (theconversation.com)
  39. ^ depends (www.jstor.org)
  40. ^ diminished standing (blogs.lse.ac.uk)

Authors: Austin Sarat, Associate Provost and Associate Dean of the Faculty and Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science, Amherst College

Read more https://theconversation.com/judges-used-to-stay-out-of-election-disputes-but-this-year-lawsuits-could-well-decide-the-presidency-147830

Metropolitan republishes selected articles from The Conversation USA with permission

Visit The Conversation to see more

Entertainment News

KAI ALECE “Raise ‘Em Up”

Sometimes, a song written by a brilliant, insightful songwriter who’s been flying – and singing - way too long under the radar, rises to meet the sociopolitical moment in unimaginably provocative ways. After hundreds of gigs throughout the Southe...

News Co - avatar News Co

How I tied an 80s Pop Icon to an Alien Abduction

I was playing guitar when I got a message that 80s rocker Tommy Tutone (Tommy Heath) wanted me to use the hook from his 1984 hit "867-5309/Jenny" in a new song.  You might know the song; it's the one with the phone number "867-5309".  It might be...

AV Super Sunshine - avatar AV Super Sunshine

An Unexpected Effect of COVID: Collaboration and Creativity

Who knew? The mentions in the news of the coronavirus hitting American shores were just beginning when my husband and I went ahead with our weekend getaway. It was late February, and we were headed to Chicago, a simple four-hour drive away from o...

Angela Predhomme - avatar Angela Predhomme

COVID-19: A MUSIC INDUSTRY KILLER

Fifty years from now—long after Covid-19 has run its course—what will historians say about how we handled this pandemic? Will they praise us for a job well done? Or will they marvel, instead, at the viral panic that led to such irrational, cont...

David P Hatherill, PhD (aka Dr Dave Smooth Jazz Recording Artist) and John Sack, MD - avatar David P Hatherill, PhD (aka Dr Dave Smooth Jazz Recording Artist) and John Sack, MD

NEW MUSIC AND VIDEO: AV SUPER SUNSHINE “X File: 8675309”

One of the most iconic phone numbers in rock history, 867-5309 began life scrawled under the name “Jenny” on a bathroom wall in 1982 – the year the band Tommy Tutone took the single to #4 on the Billboard Hot 100. Nearly four decades later, thank...

News Co - avatar News Co

COVID-19'S EFFECT ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY

The Covid-19 pandemic is affecting the music industry in ways that could ultimately turn it on its head not only during the pandemic but, perhaps, permanently. Since its inception, the business model of the music industry has remained largely un...

Brandyn Cross - avatar Brandyn Cross

Metropolitan Business News

How to Deliver the Perfect Elevator Pitch

Do you struggle with explaining your career with professional or personal contacts, and you want to make a lasting impression? Whether you're looking for a job or building up your network, a wel...

Adam Jacobs - avatar Adam Jacobs

Three Asian Countries That are Leaders in Outsourcing

Would it surprise you to know that three of the top five ranked countries for ease of doing business are in Asia? Would it surprise you more to know that India and China aren’t even in the top 3...

Adam Jacobs - avatar Adam Jacobs

FCB and oOh! help Kiwis vote with dynamic campaign for Electoral Commission

oOh!media and FCB NZ are helping Kiwi voters exercise their democratic rights this general election, via a localised dynamic Out of Home campaign for the New Zealand Electoral Commission. The c...

Lighthouse Communications. - avatar Lighthouse Communications.

MODEL/ACTOR THORN CASTILLO IS THE “NEW FACE” OF SCHICK STYLIST

In 2019, just as his multi-faceted career was taking off, Thorn Castillo heard Robert Downey Jr. offer a sage bit of advice during an interview on photographer/director Sam Jones’ acclaimed multi-...

News Company - avatar News Company

New Research Highlights Opportunities for Sports Betting

Revenue Stream for Sports’ Post-COVID-19 Recovery Strategies New Rochelle, NY, June 1, 2020— Twenty-four states have now legalized sports betting, with more states considering legalization la...

Len Stein - avatar Len Stein

How to make overseas transfers easier?

Mainstream banks can charge as much as $20 just to process a basic international money transfer. Fortunately, today people are not doomed to handling personal finances only through mainstream gl...

News Company - avatar News Company

Writers Wanted


News Co Media Group

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion