The right to vote is not in the Constitution

If you’re looking for the right to vote, you won’t find it in the United States Constitution or the Bill of Rights.

The Bill of Rights recognizes the core rights of citizens in a democracy^[1], including freedom of religion, speech, press and assembly. It then recognizes several insurance policies against an abusive government that would attempt to limit these liberties: weapons^[2]; the privacy of houses^[3] and personal information^[4]; protections^[5] against false criminal prosecution^[6] or repressive civil trials^[7]; and limits on excessive punishments^[8] by the government.

But the framers of the Constitution never mentioned a right to vote. They didn’t forget – they intentionally left it out. To put it most simply, the founders didn’t trust ordinary citizens to endorse the rights of others.

They were creating a radical experiment in self-government paired with the protection of individual rights that are often resented by the majority. As a result, they did not lay out an inherent right to vote because they feared rule by the masses would mean the destruction of – not better protection for – all the other rights the Constitution and Bill of Rights uphold. Instead, they highlighted other core rights over the vote, creating a tension that remains today.

Relying on the elite to protect minority rights

Many of the rights the founders enumerated protect small groups from the power of the majority – for instance, those who would say or publish unpopular statements, or practice unpopular religions, or hold more property than others. James Madison, a principal architect of the U.S. Constitution and the drafter of the Bill of Rights, was an intellectual and landowner who saw the two as strongly linked.

At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Madison expressed the prevailing view that “the freeholders of the country would be the safest depositories of republican liberty^[10],” meaning only people who owned land debt-free, without mortgages, would be able to vote. The Constitution left voting rules to individual states, which had long-standing laws limiting the vote to those freeholders.

In the debates over the ratification of the Constitution, Madison trumpeted a benefit of the new system: the “total exclusion of the people in their collective capacity^[11].” Even as the nation shifted toward broader inclusion in politics, Madison maintained his view that rights were fragile and ordinary people untrustworthy. In his 70s, he opposed the expansion of the franchise to nonlanded citizens when it was considered at Virginia’s Constitutional Convention in 1829, emphasizing that “the great danger^[12] is that the majority may not sufficiently respect the rights of the Minority.”

The founders believed that freedoms and rights would require the protection of an educated elite group of citizens, against an intolerant majority. They understood that protected rights and mass voting could be contradictory.

Scholarship in political science backs up many of the founders’ assessments. One of the field’s clear findings is that elites support the protection of minority rights^[13] far more than ordinary citizens^[14] do. Research has also shown that ordinary Americans are remarkably ignorant^[15] of public policies and politicians^[16], lacking even basic political knowledge^[17].

[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter^[18].]

Is there a right to vote?

What Americans think of as the right to vote doesn’t reside in the Constitution, but results from broad shifts in American public beliefs during the early 1800s. The new states that entered the union after the original 13 – beginning with Vermont, Kentucky and Tennessee – did not limit voting to property owners^[20]. Many of the new state constitutions also explicitly recognized voting rights.

As the nation grew, the idea of universal white male suffrage – championed by the commoner-President^[21] Andrew Jackson – became an article of popular faith, if not a constitutional right.

After the Civil War, the 15th Amendment^[22], ratified in 1870, guaranteed that the right to vote would not be denied on account of race: If some white people could vote, so could similarly qualified nonwhite people. But that still didn’t recognize a right to vote – only the right of equal treatment. Similarly, the 19th Amendment^[23], now 100 years old, banned voting discrimination on the basis of sex, but did not recognize an inherent right to vote.

Debates about voting rights

Today, the country remains engaged in a long-running debate about what counts as voter suppression^[25] versus what are legitimate limits or regulations^[26] on voting – like requiring voters to provide identification, barring felons from voting or removing infrequent voters from the rolls^[27].

These disputes often invoke an incorrect assumption – that voting is a constitutional right protected from the nation’s birth. The national debate over representation and rights is the product of a long-run movement toward mass voting paired with the longstanding fear of its results.

The nation has evolved from being led by an elitist set of beliefs toward a much more universal and inclusive set of assumptions. But the founders’ fears are still coming true: Levels of support for the rights of opposing parties^[28] or people of other religions^[29] are strikingly weak in the U.S. as well as around the world. Many Americans support their own rights^[30] to free speech but want to suppress^[31] the speech of those^[32] with whom they disagree^[33]. Americans may have come to believe in a universal vote, but that value does not come from the Constitution, which saw a different path to the protection of rights.

References

1. ^{^} core rights of citizens in a democracy (www.law.cornell.edu)
2. ^{^} weapons (www.law.cornell.edu)
3. ^{^} houses (www.law.cornell.edu)
4. ^{^} personal information (www.law.cornell.edu)
5. ^{^} protections (www.law.cornell.edu)
6. ^{^} false criminal prosecution (www.law.cornell.edu)
7. ^{^} repressive civil trials (www.law.cornell.edu)
8. ^{^} limits on excessive punishments (www.law.cornell.edu)
9. ^{^} White House Historical Association/Wikimedia Commons (commons.wikimedia.org)
10. ^{^} the freeholders of the country would be the safest depositories of republican liberty (avalon.law.yale.edu)
11. ^{^} total exclusion of the people in their collective capacity (avalon.law.yale.edu)
12. ^{^} the great danger (rotunda.upress.virginia.edu)
13. ^{^} protection of minority rights (www.cambridge.org)
14. ^{^} more than ordinary citizens (www.jstor.org)
15. ^{^} remarkably ignorant (doi.org)
16. ^{^} public policies and politicians (yalebooks.yale.edu)
17. ^{^} basic political knowledge (www.washingtonpost.com)
18. ^{^} Sign up for our weekly newsletter (theconversation.com)
19. ^{^} Ralph Eleaser Whiteside Earl/Wikimedia Commons (commons.wikimedia.org)
20. ^{^} did not limit voting to property owners (www.cambridge.org)
21. ^{^} commoner-President (www.kqed.org)
22. ^{^} 15th Amendment (www.law.cornell.edu)
23. ^{^} 19th Amendment (www.law.cornell.edu)
24. ^{^} AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez (newsroom.ap.org)
25. ^{^} voter suppression (democracyjournal.org)
26. ^{^} legitimate limits or regulations (www.scotusblog.com)
27. ^{^} removing infrequent voters from the rolls (www.scotusblog.com)
28. ^{^} opposing parties (www.pewresearch.org)
29. ^{^} people of other religions (www.pewresearch.org)
30. ^{^} their own rights (www.insidehighered.com)
31. ^{^} suppress (www.bariweiss.com)
32. ^{^} speech of those (www.zogbyanalytics.com)
33. ^{^} they disagree (www.zogbyanalytics.com)