As Democratic primaries near, educators can teach hope to a polarized citizenry
- Written by Sarah Stitzlein, Professor of Education and Affiliate Faculty in Philosophy, University of Cincinnati
With the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary approaching[1] many Americans are making their choice[2], although there are those who are still struggling with who to vote for.
Elections often inspire hope, but that hope can quickly turn to political despair when candidates fall short of voters’ expectations.
As a philosopher[3] who specializes in citizenship education and political theory, I believe that political hope can be taught in schools and colleges. As I argue in my new open-access book[4], hope can lay a pathway to help citizens make good choices at the ballot box and sustain political engagement well after the polls close.
Despair in democracy
A recent study[5] published in the Journal of Democracy found that across the globe citizens have “become more cynical” about the value of a democratic system and “less hopeful” of their ability to influence public policy.
In the United States, people are disenchanted with democracy[6] for many reasons. Some felt former President Barack Obama fell short[7] of meeting his bold promises, from offering more retirement account options for the poor to providing universal health care. Similarly, while Trump was regarded as a “savior” figure[8] in some communities, some of his supporters now find their expectations were not met[9].
A much larger reason for being frustrated is that, as scholar Wendy Brown[10] points out, economic ideologies have made many Americans less inclined to pursue[11] what is in the common good. A shift toward self-interest also moves people away from democratic behavior. It contributes to distrust of fellow citizens[12], and it could bring cynicism about the effectiveness of democratic government.
Teaching political hope
Rather than despair, my research shows that our presidential election season is an opportunity for educators, parents and community leaders[13] to open up inquiry. Here are a few things they can do to develop more hopeful citizens.
Help students explore real social and political problems[14] to better understand citizens’ struggles and needs both in the past and today. Martin Luther King Day and Black History Month, for example, could be used as opportunities to showcase the hopeful endeavors of leaders and everyday citizens who fight for civil rights and against the political despair of the times.
Challenge growing citizens to see that genuine political hope is a call to ongoing collective work. Programs such as the Freechild Institute[15] and the Mikva Challenge[16] provide a model for how to mobilize students to act to improve their communities. In these programs, young people are encouraged to identify problems and are supported in expressing their views about them. Students can learn how to imagine better futures[17] and take steps toward it.
Reaffirm the value of shared political governance. An example of such mentoring comes from a school in Minneapolis[18] where students became concerned that one school had a large playground while another one, next to it, had very little playground facilities. Instead of harboring hostile feelings, students took positive actions. They surveyed students of both schools and gathered evidence on the impact of the inequality. They also worked with the school administrations and the local press to voice their concerns. In the end, students put forward a proposal that was fairer toward everyone. In the process, students learned how to listen, collaborate[19] and build trust – something all citizens should learn.
Expressing dissent
Teachers can teach students how to not only express dissatisfaction, but help others understand it as well.
KMH Photovideo/Shutterstock.com[20]
Teachers can also help their students understand the relationship between hope and dissent[21]. When citizens focus on the improved future they hope for, they may become frustrated with how things are now.
For example, after a gunman killed 17 students at a high school in Parkland, Florida, students from that school and across the U.S. staged widespread protests demanding safer schools[22].
Some educators helped students learn how to not only express dissatisfaction, but help others understand it. Some teachers, for example, helped students describe the problems and experience of gun violence by creating press packets[23]. Parents aided children in constructing messages to share with legislators[24].
Students learned how to put forward solutions to be discussed and tested. Members of the school newspaper were guest editors of a U.S. edition of The Guardian[25] a British newspaper, which outlined their vision for change.
Questioning power structures
Educators can cultivate critical thinking. This is not just the deep thinking that most of us expect in all classes. It is thinking that interrogates power structures[26], identifies injustice and asserts principles of democracy.
Following the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown Jr. in Ferguson, some educators, for example, helped students understand[27] the history of racism in order to better critique policing injustice today and describe an America where black lives matter[28]. When students learn this history, their critiques of the present and their vision for the future are better informed.
Tell a story
Finally, educators can nurture imagination and support students in constructing stories about improved ways of living. Stories show examples of how to take action and why it’s worthwhile to do so.
Storytelling also includes listening to the needs of others. Learning how to pay attention to the lives of others can improve citizens’ visions for the future.
As Americans head to the polls, universities and schools can help voters and youth shape and respond to the election. They can help budding citizens identify candidates who listen to the needs of voters and craft stories of a desirable future. These are stories that don’t depend on the candidate as the hero, but rather are inclusive and inspiring calls to collective work to improve our society.
Such efforts can sustain the hope of voters, transition those emotions into collective action and revive democracy well beyond 2020.
This is an updated version of a piece first published[29] on Jan. 30, 2019.
[ Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter[30]. ]
References
- ^ Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary approaching (www.vox.com)
- ^ making their choice (www.desmoinesregister.com)
- ^ philosopher (sarahstitzlein.wixsite.com)
- ^ new open-access book (www.oxfordscholarship.com)
- ^ recent study (www.journalofdemocracy.org)
- ^ disenchanted with democracy (www.infoagepub.com)
- ^ fell short (www.politifact.com)
- ^ regarded as a “savior” figure (www.bbc.com)
- ^ expectations were not met (www.washingtonpost.com)
- ^ Wendy Brown (polisci.berkeley.edu)
- ^ less inclined to pursue (mitpress.mit.edu)
- ^ contributes to distrust of fellow citizens (www.worldcat.org)
- ^ opportunity for educators, parents and community leaders (www.gutenberg.org)
- ^ social and political problems (tischcollege.tufts.edu)
- ^ Freechild Institute (freechild.org)
- ^ Mikva Challenge (www.mikvachallenge.org)
- ^ imagine better futures (www.routledge.com)
- ^ school in Minneapolis (inside.augsburg.edu)
- ^ listen, collaborate (cup.columbia.edu)
- ^ KMH Photovideo/Shutterstock.com (www.shutterstock.com)
- ^ the relationship between hope and dissent (www.routledge.com)
- ^ demanding safer schools (theconversation.com)
- ^ press packets (www.npr.org)
- ^ legislators (www.miamiherald.com)
- ^ The Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ interrogates power structures (democracyeducationjournal.org)
- ^ helped students understand (www.theatlantic.com)
- ^ black lives matter (www.rethinkingschools.org)
- ^ first published (theconversation.com)
- ^ Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter (theconversation.com)
Authors: Sarah Stitzlein, Professor of Education and Affiliate Faculty in Philosophy, University of Cincinnati
