Metropolitan Digital

The Conversation

  • Written by David Campbell, Associate Professor of Public Administration, Binghamton University, State University of New York
The downside of doing good with a market mindset

Billionaires made some eye-popping donations in 2018.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos announced plans to spend US$2 billion[1] to help the homeless and create a network of free preschools. Media mogul and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg pledged $1.8 billion[2] to Johns Hopkins University, his alma mater. Those were just the biggest of the nearly 800 donations of $1 million or more from very rich people over the course of the year, the Chronicle of Philanthropy reports[3].

While it might seem ungrateful for the rest of us to do anything but cheer about boatloads of money being given away, there are legitimate reasons for concern, as the journalist Anand Giridharadas[4] raises in his provocative new book “Winners Take All[5].” In particular, he makes a compelling argument against the increasingly dominant way of thinking about philanthropy that emphasizes the impacts that givers expect[6] from their donations.

When the winners take all

Learning whether their giving achieves the results they want is front and center[7] for charities and their funders, as many scholars of philanthropy, including me[8], have found. Many of the largest givers are increasingly reporting results information[9] on their websites and sharing what they’ve learned[10].

But perhaps all the focusing on data misses a larger point. Giridharadas questions whether these well-intentioned donors have diagnosed the problems correctly. If what he calls “solutions peddling” is focused on the wrong thing, he suggests, the results they seek will inevitably fail to address the most pressing issues of our times.

The book Anand Giridharadas wrote about the limits of modern philanthropy grew from a controversial talk he made in 2015.

Giridharadas contends that the wealthy philanthropists and other prominent social change leaders co-exist in a parallel universe he calls “MarketWorld,” where the best solutions to society’s problems require the same knowhow used in corporate boardrooms. That is because MarketWorld, as he sees it, ignores the underlying causes for problems like poverty and hunger.

Its virtual inhabitants do this, he argues, because inequality causes many of these issues. And taking on inequality directly threatens the status and power of elite donors.

Paradox of privilege

“Winners Take All” is one of several recently published books[11] raising difficult questions[12] about how the world’s biggest donors[13] approach their giving. As someone who studies, teaches and believes in philanthropy, I believe these writers have started an important debate that could potentially lead future donors to make make a bigger difference with their giving.

Giridharadas to a degree echoes Ford Foundation President Darren Walker[14], who has made a stir by denouncing a “paradox of privilege[15]” that “shields (wealthy people) from fully experiencing or acknowledging inequality, even while giving us more power to do something about it.”

Like Walker[16], Giridharadas finds it hard to shake the words of Martin Luther King Jr., who spoke of “the circumstances of economic injustice which make philanthropy necessary.”

To avoid changes that might endanger their privileges, mega-donors typically seek what they call win-win solutions. But however impressive the quantifiable results of those efforts may seem, according to this argument, those outcomes will always fall short. Fixes that don’t threaten the powers that be leave underlying issues intact.

Avoiding win-lose solutions

In Giridharadas’s view, efforts by big funders[17], such as The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation[18] and the Walton Family Foundation[19], to strengthen public K-12 education systems by funding charter schools look past the primary reason why not all students learn at the same pace: inequality[20].

As long as school systems are funded locally, based on property values, students in wealthy communities will have advantages over those residing in poorer ones. However, creating a more equal system to pay for schools would take tax dollars and advantages away from the rich. The wealthy would lose, and the disadvantaged would win.

So it’s possible to see the nearly $500 million[21] billionaires and other rich people have pumped into charter schools and other education reform efforts over the past dozen years as a way to dodge this problem.

Charters have surely made a difference for some kids, such as those in rural Oregon[22] whose schools might otherwise have closed. But since the bid to expand charters doesn’t address childhood poverty[23] or challenge the status quo – aside from diluting the power of teacher unions[24] and raising the stakes in school board elections[25] – this approach seems unlikely to help all schoolchildren.

Indeed, years into the quest to fix this problem without overhauling school funding systems[26], most public schools in poor communities have less money than those in wealthier ones[27].

Paying for tuition

Bloomberg’s big donation raises a similar question.

He aims to make a Johns Hopkins education more accessible for promising low-income students. When so many Hopkins alumni[28] have enjoyed success in a wide range of careers, what can be wrong with that?

Well, paying tuition challenges millions of Americans, not just the thousands who might attend Hopkins[29]. Tuition, fees, room and board at the top-ranked school cost about $65,000 a year.

Only 5 percent of colleges and universities were affordable[30], according to the Institute for Higher Education Policy, a nonpartisan global research and policy center, for students from families earning $69,000 a year or less.

Like Giridharadas, the institute argues paying for college is “largely a problem of inequity.”

Bloomberg’s gift will certainly help some people earn a Hopkins degree. But it does nothing about the bigger challenge of making college more affordable for all in a country where student debt has surpassed $1.5 trillion[31].

One alternative would be to finance advocacy for legislative remedies to address affordability and inequity. For affluent donors, Giridharadas argues, this could prove to be a nonstarter. Like most of what he calls “win-lose solutions[32],” taking that route would lead to higher taxes for the wealthy.

Subsidies for gifts from the rich

Similarly, who could quibble with Bezos spending $2 billion to fund preschools[33] and homeless shelters? Although he has not yet made clear what results he’s after, I have no doubt they will make a difference for countless Americans.

No matter how he goes about it, the gesture still raises questions. As Stanford University philanthropy scholar Rob Reich[34] explains in his new book “Just Giving[35],” the tax break rich Americans get when they make charitable contributions subsidizes their favorite causes.

Or, to phrase it another way, the federal government gives initiatives supported by Bezos and other wealthy donors like him preferential treatment. Does that make sense in a democracy? Reich says that it doesn’t.

The elected representatives in democracies should decide how best to solve problems with tax dollars, not billionaires who are taken with one cause or another, the Stanford professor asserts.

That’s why I think it’s so important to ask the critical questions that Giridharadas and Reich are raising, and why the students taking my philanthropy classes this semester will be reading “Winners Take All” and “Just Giving.”

Editor’s note: Johns Hopkins University Press provides funding as a member of The Conversation US, which also has a grant from the Walton Family Foundation. The Gates Foundation is a funder of The Conversation Media Group.

References

  1. ^ Jeff Bezos announced plans to spend US$2 billion (www.cnbc.com)
  2. ^ pledged $1.8 billion (releases.jhu.edu)
  3. ^ Chronicle of Philanthropy reports (www.philanthropy.com)
  4. ^ Anand Giridharadas (www.vox.com)
  5. ^ Winners Take All (www.penguinrandomhouse.com)
  6. ^ impacts that givers expect (impact.msdf.org)
  7. ^ front and center (www.tandfonline.com)
  8. ^ including me (scholar.google.com)
  9. ^ reporting results information (www.macfound.org)
  10. ^ sharing what they’ve learned (cep.org)
  11. ^ several recently published books (www.newyorker.com)
  12. ^ difficult questions (www.penguinrandomhouse.com)
  13. ^ world’s biggest donors (decolonizingwealth.com)
  14. ^ Ford Foundation President Darren Walker (wamu.org)
  15. ^ paradox of privilege (www.fordfoundation.org)
  16. ^ Like Walker (www.fordfoundation.org)
  17. ^ efforts by big funders (philanthropynewsdigest.org)
  18. ^ The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (theconversation.com)
  19. ^ Walton Family Foundation (www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org)
  20. ^ inequality (edlabs.harvard.edu)
  21. ^ nearly $500 million (wtop.com)
  22. ^ rural Oregon (theconversation.com)
  23. ^ childhood poverty (www.insightintodiversity.com)
  24. ^ teacher unions (psmag.com)
  25. ^ school board elections (blogs.edweek.org)
  26. ^ school funding systems (www.npr.org)
  27. ^ have less money than those in wealthier ones (apps.urban.org)
  28. ^ many Hopkins alumni (www.jhu.edu)
  29. ^ Hopkins (www.usnews.com)
  30. ^ 5 percent of colleges and universities were affordable (www.ihep.org)
  31. ^ $1.5 trillion (www.marketwatch.com)
  32. ^ win-lose solutions (knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu)
  33. ^ $2 billion to fund preschools (twitter.com)
  34. ^ Rob Reich (pacscenter.stanford.edu)
  35. ^ Just Giving (press.princeton.edu)

Authors: David Campbell, Associate Professor of Public Administration, Binghamton University, State University of New York

Read more http://theconversation.com/the-downside-of-doing-good-with-a-market-mindset-109210

Metropolitan republishes selected articles from The Conversation USA with permission

Visit The Conversation to see more

Entertainment News

Phish’s 2018 Fall Tour to Conclude with Four Performances at MGM Grand Garden Arena

LAS VEGAS (May 15, 2018) – Phish, the American rock band known worldwide for its dedicated fan base, recently announced a 14-date Fall tour which will conclude in Las Vegas with four performances at...

Blane Ferguson - avatar Blane Ferguson

Dave Damiani and The No Vacancy Orchestra are “Bending The Standard”

Tina Sinatra, Dave Damiani & Landau Murphy Jr. celebrate 100 years of Frank Sinatra in Los Angeles There have been stories about independent filmmakers, but how about the independent big band...

Tom Estey - avatar Tom Estey

Billboard Chart-Topping Saxophonist VANDELL ANDREW Returns With New Single

From the vantage point of 30, his age and the name of his infectious, sensually grooving new full length album, Vandell continues to be fueled by the impressive roar of accolades and achievements th...

Metropolitan Digital - avatar Metropolitan Digital

Metropolitan Business News

Marketing Impact of Having Online Product Reviews

Whether they are searching online for a service or a specific product, in many cases customers tend to look for online product reviews. They often want to make a comparison to other products or simply...

News Company - avatar News Company

NYC-BASED PUBLIC TELECOM GIANT TCC TELEPLEX LAUNCHES

“TOMORROW’S HIGH TECH DIGITAL NETWORK TODAY” WITH ITS REVOLUTIONARY, MULT-MEDIA AND SERVICES DRIVEN IAP “EVERYTHING” KIOSK The TCC Teleplex IAP Kiosks Include a High-Res 360-Degree Webcam, a 22-...

Thomas Estey - avatar Thomas Estey

HOW TO PREPARE FOR RETIREMENT: Finding and Living Your “It”

The name of my Woburn, MA financial services firm is Summit Financial Partners for a very good reason – because the clients I work with have either reached their retirement summit (i.e. they’re ready ...

Ryan Skinner, Founder and Principal, Summit Financial Partners - avatar Ryan Skinner, Founder and Principal, Summit Financial Partners

How to build a distinctive Brand Voice

Nearly four decades ago, I made a presentation that captured considerable attention in the marketing community. The subject was ‘Brand Voice.’ The concept is widely used today by branding profess...

Alan Siegel Founder and President Siegelvision - avatar Alan Siegel Founder and President Siegelvision

ADROLL RELAUNCHES BRAND WITH NEW COMPANY VISION

AdRoll, the growth platform for ambitious commerce businesses, has today announced an exciting new phase in the evolution of the AdRoll brand for its 37,000 customers worldwide. Recognising its uniq...

Anahid Basmajian - avatar Anahid Basmajian

Global Shop Solutions Customer Load King Goes Live with Manufacturing Factory of the Future

THE WOODLANDS, TX, February 22, 2018 – After nearly 9 months of preparation, Load King, a world leader in store fixture manufacturing, has successfully finished their manufacturing factory of the fu...

Kathryn Hosford - avatar Kathryn Hosford

Holidays

Maya Beach Opens to Tourists

Despite recent reports that Southern Thailand's famous Maya Beach will close for three months this year, in fact no decision to this effect has been made by Thai authorities. Phi Phi Nati...

Maevadi Rosenfeldt - avatar Maevadi Rosenfeldt

SKYN LAUNCHES GUIDE TO THE BEST PLACES TO GET INTIMATE

SKYN®, Australia’s best-selling condom*, today launches its very first SKYN® Places of Intimacy Guide.   Curated in partnership with GQ Magazine and Conde Nast, the Guide features 30 lux...

SKYN - avatar SKYN

Under the Stars with Grand American Adventures

Small group adventure specialist Grand American Adventures offers a comprehensive range of thrilling tours across the Americas, but what really sets their tours apart is the unique accom...

Louise Woodruff - avatar Louise Woodruff