Metropolitan Digital

The Conversation

  • Written by Alesha Durfee, Associate Professor of Women and Gender Studies, Arizona State University

After voting to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, Sen. Joe Manchin said that he made his choice even though he supported survivors of sexual abuse and believed that “we have to do something as a country” about sexual violence.

“I’m very much concerned… with the sexual abuse that people had to endure,” he said. “But I had to deal with the facts I had in front of me.”[1]

The testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, and Kavanaugh’s confirmation despite that testimony, is a prominent example of what happens when abuse survivors engage with systems that were never designed to respond to their words or meet their needs.

Although few survivors testify in front of the Senate, the process by which Ford was forced to tell her story, and the reaction of senators to that story, is strikingly similar to what abuse survivors undergo every day in civil and criminal courts.

I am a scholar of domestic violence[2], and my work has focused on analyzing the stories survivors share when they seek safety.

I’ve also studied what happens when the legal system processes these stories.

What I’ve found is a fundamental mismatch between what survivors disclose and what legal systems need to hear to take action.

Victims and systems unaligned

Legal institutions ask survivors to explain why they need legal protection, to tell their story of abuse. But, as noted by scholars Shonna Trinch[3] and Susan Berk-Seligson[4], “What is needed by those whose job is to listen to them is a report, not a story[5].”

Courts want a report that is linear, providing an almost external accounting of abuse with specific names, dates and “facts.” Survivors expect to be able to share what they have experienced in a way that reflects how they have made sense of the event and its aftermath.

The end result is that we have systems that are supposed to help, but in general are unable to adequately assess and respond to survivors’ stories.

Kavanaugh confirmation could spark a reckoning with system that often fails survivors of sexual abuse and assault Activists demonstrate as the Senate Judiciary Committee hears from both Ford and Kavanaugh. AP//J. Scott Applewhite[6]

My research shows that survivors who disclose their abuse often hear initial statements of support and belief. Those statements are quickly negated by a “but” and an explanation of why someone will continue to act as if that story had never been told.

How did we end up with this system?

Many scholars, including Kimberlé Crenshaw[7], argue that institutions, including the legal system, design policies based on stereotypes about survivors that rarely reflect their actual circumstances[8]. That’s especially true with survivors who are not “good victims” or who are not white, middle-class women[9] who have external documentation of physical abuse.

This explains how what appears to be neutral system can produce different outcomes for people based on the intersections of gender, race, sexuality, age, citizenship status and other aspects of social identities.

For example, using victim advocates from a prosecutor’s office or police department to assist survivors filing for protection orders that would keep them safe from their abusers appears to be an effective use of resources.

But many abuse survivors have legal problems themselves or mistrust the legal system. They may not want to report the violence they’ve experienced because they could become the target of immigration enforcement or child protective services.

For many survivors, it’s easier and safer to not report the abuse and pretend that the resulting trauma never happened.

Puzzles in the aftermath

To an outsider, the choice not to report in the moment, or even years later, does not make sense.

They do not understand[10] how survivors compartmentalize in order to survive or even thrive. They do not see that survivors evolve complex ways of coping, such as Ford’s insistence on constructing double front doors[11] at her home so she’d be able to escape through one if the other was blocked.

The legal system’s rules of evidence, evidentiary requirements and statutes of limitations all reflect this.

What I’ve found in my research is that the legal system wants short, brief reports that focus on legally relevant acts of abuse, contain specific information and include supplemental documentation.

Few survivors can craft those types of narratives unassisted.

And many survivors – especially those who are of color, are poor or do not have U.S. citizenship, and who are not heterosexual – do not see institutions like the legal system as a resource.

Those institutions aren’t designed with their goals, needs and motivations in mind. When they witness events like the confirmation hearing, where a woman with education and privilege discloses sexual violence and nothing happens, how can they be expected to entrust their own narratives of abuse to others?

Kavanaugh confirmation could spark a reckoning with system that often fails survivors of sexual abuse and assault Many survivors of assault are afraid to make reports to the police. Jacek Wojnarowski/Shutterstock[12]

Speaking up

Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that “I’m dejected, but only momentarily, when I can’t get the fifth vote for something I think is very important. But then you go on to the next challenge and you give it your all. You know that these important issues are not going to go away. They are going to come back again and again. There’ll be another time, another day[13].”

For some survivors, today, in the aftermath of Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony, is finally that day. They are filling out protection order petitions, calling the police, reaching out for help.

But in some cases, they will be denied an order, the abuser will not be sanctioned or they themselves will be mistakenly arrested instead of, or along with, their abuser. In the toughest cases, like that of Melanie Edwards in Washington state[14], they will be killed by their abusers.

The United States should rethink how to help survivors of violence and how to sanction perpetrators.

Helping or hurting?

In the right environment and with the right support, survivors will want to tell their stories and will be empowered and validated by that retelling.

However, the legal system is an adversarial system with confusing and complex bureaucratic procedures and often untrained staff. As trauma scholar Dr. Judith Herman[15] explains, “If one set out intentionally to design a system for provoking symptoms of traumatic stress, it might look very much like a court of law[16].”

Survivors are asked to recall specific details about their victimization that they have repressed in order to survive. As one advocate said to me in an interview, “They’re trying to forget what happened and here I am, asking them to write down, with as many details as they can, what they went through[17].”

How might we create a more responsive system?

First: Stop requiring survivors to narrate their abuse. It’s more detrimental than helpful, especially if we simply discount it as a “story” afterward.

If there is some form of external documentation, survivors should be able to provide that instead. If there is no external documentation, then the narrative should be elicited in a supportive environment of the survivor’s choosing, with trained staff available to help them better understand the kinds of information judges and law enforcement need.

Second: People charged with listening and responding to survivors need to be educated about the dynamics of domestic and sexual violence. While some are, many do not fully understand the ways in which domestic and sexual violence impact survivors. It is impossible for them to hear and respond appropriately unless they understand those dynamics.

The confirmation hearings, and the responses to Ford’s testimony, underscored this idea. While the remarks of some senators after her testimony[18] reflected that they understand that they should “support” and “believe” survivors of violence, they also showed they were not informed about how survivors act in response to and process sexual trauma.

It’s as if they were saying: I believe, but I don’t understand, so your story does not exist for me in that it does not force me to act or impact my vote.

Finally: Explore what believing and supporting a survivor means.

While the words “I believe” and “I support” are critically important, they should not become buzzwords that replace actions. When you believe a survivor and decide to support that survivor, you must act. You must make hard, even unpopular, decisions.

You must work to adapt the system in order to uphold justice.

I believe. Period. I believe.

References

  1. ^ deal with the facts I had in front of me.” (www.msnbc.com)
  2. ^ I am a scholar of domestic violence (scholar.google.com)
  3. ^ Shonna Trinch (www.jjay.cuny.edu)
  4. ^ Susan Berk-Seligson (as.vanderbilt.edu)
  5. ^ a report, not a story (www.jstor.org)
  6. ^ AP//J. Scott Applewhite (www.apimages.com)
  7. ^ Kimberlé Crenshaw (www.law.columbia.edu)
  8. ^ design policies based on stereotypes about survivors that rarely reflect their actual circumstances (www.jstor.org)
  9. ^ white, middle-class women (doi.org)
  10. ^ They do not understand (www.psychologytoday.com)
  11. ^ insistence on constructing double front doors (www.cnn.com)
  12. ^ Jacek Wojnarowski/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  13. ^ another time, another day (books.google.com)
  14. ^ Melanie Edwards in Washington state (community.seattletimes.nwsource.com)
  15. ^ Dr. Judith Herman (us.macmillan.com)
  16. ^ like a court of law (www.goodreads.com)
  17. ^ what they went through (repository.law.miami.edu)
  18. ^ remarks of some senators after her testimony (www.washingtonpost.com)

Authors: Alesha Durfee, Associate Professor of Women and Gender Studies, Arizona State University

Read more http://theconversation.com/kavanaugh-confirmation-could-spark-a-reckoning-with-system-that-often-fails-survivors-of-sexual-abuse-and-assault-104564

Metropolitan republishes selected articles from The Conversation USA with permission

Visit The Conversation to see more

Entertainment News

Destiny Malibu, one of the year’s 25 break-out artists

POP SINGER, SONGWRITER SET TO RELEASE "LO SIENTO" ON FEBRUARY 28th, 2020 ‘Destiny Malibu, one of the year’s 25 break-out artists’ - Shutter16.com ‘Independent singer, songwriter, talent, inspirat...

Tom Estey - avatar Tom Estey

Music Legend Stephen Wrench

Stephen Wrench proclaims he’s “played with everybody and every band but been a member of nothing.” Having penned literally hundreds of songs in all genres for years – pop, rock, country, R&B, ...

Tom Estey - avatar Tom Estey

GREYE

On their latest single, the groovin’ and visceral “Lucky,” GREYE puts an ironic spin on people’s perceptions. When the singer hits the chorus, “Oh may, may we all be so lucky, lucky, lucky, just like ...

Staff writer - avatar Staff writer

Metropolitan Business News

Impact of good marketing on sales

Sales and marketing are brothers as they go hand and in hand. The job of both of these departments is to generate revenue so that an organization can make money. A company that does not generate rev...

News Company - avatar News Company

7 effective tips for increasing sales in retail

It seems that retailers have drawn a difficult lot in the 21st century: competition from online retail is growing steadily. After all, Internet retailers can sell your products at significantly lowe...

News Company - avatar News Company

10 Reasons to Use Labels

People cannot stop biting their nails, considering the messy condition of their homes. You open your kitchen drawer to grab some utensils, but instead, you take a glance at toys lying inside that dr...

News Company - avatar News Company

15 ways to encourage your office employees

We often get so busy managing our companies and business that we forget about the most important resource that is making our business reach new height every day, our employees. Support of the manage...

News Company - avatar News Company

FAQs About Forex Trading

Today everything is so easily accessible, perfect, and glamorous. Have you ever wondered living in a time with no money? Well, let's just go back in the ancient times when a valuable piece of paper ...

News Company - avatar News Company

RETIREMENT FINANCIAL EXPERT RYAN SKINNER - A STEP ABOVE THE REST

The name of my Woburn, MA retirement services firm is Summit Financial Partners for a very good reason -because the clients I work with have either reached their retirement summit (i.e. they’re re...

Tom Estey - avatar Tom Estey

Holidays

New Baggage Regulations to Help Aussie Parents Travel with Infants

Travelling around the globe has never been easy, especially when infants tag along for the trip. One of the main issues that parents often have to deal with is the need to bring extra item...

News Company - avatar News Company

Maya Beach Opens to Tourists

Despite recent reports that Southern Thailand's famous Maya Beach will close for three months this year, in fact no decision to this effect has been made by Thai authorities. Phi Phi Nati...

Maevadi Rosenfeldt - avatar Maevadi Rosenfeldt

SKYN LAUNCHES GUIDE TO THE BEST PLACES TO GET INTIMATE

SKYN®, Australia’s best-selling condom*, today launches its very first SKYN® Places of Intimacy Guide.   Curated in partnership with GQ Magazine and Conde Nast, the Guide features 30 lux...

SKYN - avatar SKYN