The Times Real Estate


.

  • Written by Tazreena Sajjad, Senior Professorial Lecturer of Global Governance, Politics and Security, American University School of International Service
Afghan evacuees lack a clear path for resettlement in the U.S., 7 months after Taliban takeover

Russia’s war against Ukraine has resulted in more than 4 million[1] Ukrainian refugees fleeing the country.

The United States said on March 24, 2022, that it would welcome 100,000 Ukrainian refugees.[2]

The Ukrainian refugee situation continues to overshadow another refugee crisis. That crisis stems from the U.S. military’s official withdrawal[3] from Afghanistan in August 2021.

Since the withdrawal, approximately 84,600[4] Afghans were evacuated to the U.S.

It is estimated that thousands of Afghans vulnerable to the Taliban have been left behind.

“There are still Afghans being killed by the Taliban because we haven’t gotten them out of the country,” U.S. Congressman Seth Moulton said on March 28[5].

As a scholar[6] of refugees and post-conflict reconstruction, I believe that the deteriorating situation[7] in Afghanistan will continue to result in rising numbers of refugees in the years to come.

Children and adults are seen from a distance in front of beige, white and blue tents, all fenced in
Young Afghan evacuees at a U.S. military base in Germany in October 2021. Lukas Schulze/Getty Images[8]

A hasty retreat

Prior to the U.S. military withdrawal, Afghanistan produced the second-largest number[9] of refugees in the world, topping 2.6 million[10]. The largest refugee crisis comes from 11 years of war in Syria[11].

Following the Soviet Union invasion in 1979, the majority of Afghan refugees have fled to Iran and Pakistan[12]. Since then, ongoing civil war and violence as well as the U.S. invasion in 2001 prompted more people to seek refuge in these countries.

As humanitarian needs[13] in Afghanistan now grow, Afghans continue to cross into these[14] countries.

The U.S. evacuation of Afghan refugees in 2021 was the largest evacuation effort in U.S. history since the 1975 Operation New Life, when 110,000 Vietnamese refugees were evacuated to Guam after the fall of Saigon.[15][16]

President Biden called the Afghan evacuations an “extraordinary success.”[17]

But there was bipartisan condemnation[18] in Congress of the hasty nature of the withdrawal and evacuations, which resulted in many Afghans and some American citizens being left behind.

Refugee system cuts

In September 2021, the White House requested Congress to authorize $6.4 billion[19] and received $6.3 billion[20] for Afghan resettlement.

But the nine U.S. refugee resettlement agencies[21] designated to welcome and support refugee arrivals have still struggled to assist the large number of Afghans because of limited staff and continued funding shortages.

This is partially because during the Trump administration, there were severe cuts to the number of refugees allowed in to the U.S.[22] President Donald Trump also cut budgets for refugee spending.[23]

Afghan evacuees in the U.S. also continue to face legal and logistical[24] challenges in their long-term resettlement process.

Difficult to stay in US

Typically, the U.S. admits foreigners like Afghans who might fear to return to their home countries as either refugees[25] or, less often, asylum recipients[26]. Both of these options allow non-citizens to legally work and live in the U.S., and to eventually gain citizenship.

For Afghan evacuees, the legal pathways to stay permanently in the U.S. are complicated.

Some of the recent Afghan evacuees are recipients of special immigrant visas[27]. These visas have gone to those who worked closely with the U.S. military in Afghanistan, and give benefits like work permits and a clear pathway to becoming citizens.

The majority of the evacuees, however, received humanitarian parole[28] - a temporary status given for emergency humanitarian situations. This is valid for up to two years.

On March 16, 2022, the Biden administration also announced that Afghans already living in the U.S. would receive Temporary Protected Status[29]. This gives Afghans legal work permits, but only lasts for 18 months.

The Department of Homeland Security estimates[30] 74,500 Afghan nationals could be eligible for this status.

Some Afghan resettlement advocates are pushing for Congress to pass legislation[31] that would allow certain Afghan evacuees to apply for permanent legal status in the U.S.

A U.S. soldier stands in front of a sign that says Evacuees from Afghanistan wait to board a passenger plane bound for the U.S. at the U.S. military’s Ramstein air base in October 2021. Lukas Schulze/Getty Images[32]

Desperate Afghans outside the U.S.

Back in Afghanistan, the Taliban’s takeover[33] has prompted a severe humanitarian[34] and economic crisis[35].

About 95% of Afghans[36] are not getting enough to eat, according to the United Nations.

Taliban reprisals against Afghans who worked for the previous government, for the U.S. military, for U.S.-based nonprofit organizations and for democracy and human rights have intensified[37] over the last several months.

There are at least 78,000[38] special immigrant visa applicants who remain stranded in Afghanistan, waiting for their visas to be processed.

Since July 2021, there have also been 43,000 Afghans[39] outside of the U.S. who have submitted humanitarian parole applications - which cost $575 each[40] - to enter the U.S.

To date, the U.S. has approved parole for only 170[41] applicants.

The exact number of Afghans who worked in democracy, human rights, journalism, law and education, including former students of the U.S.-government funded American University of Kabul[42], who are desperate to flee Taliban rule remains unknown.

For many of these Afghans - some of whom were separated[43] from family during the evacuation process - hopes of resettlement[44] in the U.S. are fading.

In a recent conversation about the challenges facing Afghan evacuees in the U.S., Arash Azizzada, an advocate with the diaspora coalition Afghans for a Better Tomorrow[45], explained to me that “There is a sense that the U.S. has abandoned Afghanistan.”

“Afghan-Americans and military veterans have sprung into action to respond to Afghans in crisis. But we can’t do this alone. We need more support to welcome Afghans with dignity,” Azizzada continued.

[The Conversation’s Politics + Society editors pick need-to-know stories. Sign up for Politics Weekly[46].]

References

  1. ^ 4 million (data2.unhcr.org)
  2. ^ 100,000 Ukrainian refugees. (www.whitehouse.gov)
  3. ^ U.S. military’s official withdrawal (www.cnbc.com)
  4. ^ 84,600 (www.dhs.gov)
  5. ^ said on March 28 (www.washingtonpost.com)
  6. ^ a scholar (scholar.google.com)
  7. ^ deteriorating situation (www.hrw.org)
  8. ^ Lukas Schulze/Getty Images (media.gettyimages.com)
  9. ^ second-largest number (reliefweb.int)
  10. ^ 2.6 million (www.unhcr.org)
  11. ^ Syria (www.unrefugees.org)
  12. ^ Iran and Pakistan (www.american.edu)
  13. ^ humanitarian needs (www.cfr.org)
  14. ^ these (www.nytimes.com)
  15. ^ Operation New Life (www.amazon.com)
  16. ^ fall of Saigon. (www.washingtonpost.com)
  17. ^ “extraordinary success.” (www.cnbc.com)
  18. ^ bipartisan condemnation (www.npr.org)
  19. ^ $6.4 billion (www.usatoday.com)
  20. ^ $6.3 billion (immigrationforum.org)
  21. ^ U.S. refugee resettlement agencies (www.unhcr.org)
  22. ^ the number of refugees allowed in to the U.S. (theworld.org)
  23. ^ budgets for refugee spending. (abcnews.go.com)
  24. ^ logistical (www.npr.org)
  25. ^ as either refugees (www.state.gov)
  26. ^ asylum recipients (www.uscis.gov)
  27. ^ special immigrant visas (www.rescue.org)
  28. ^ humanitarian parole (www.acf.hhs.gov)
  29. ^ Temporary Protected Status (www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org)
  30. ^ estimates (crsreports.congress.gov)
  31. ^ pass legislation (www.hias.org)
  32. ^ Lukas Schulze/Getty Images (media.gettyimages.com)
  33. ^ Taliban’s takeover (www.nytimes.com)
  34. ^ severe humanitarian (www.thenewhumanitarian.org)
  35. ^ economic crisis (www.mei.edu)
  36. ^ 95% of Afghans (news.un.org)
  37. ^ intensified (www.euronews.com)
  38. ^ at least 78,000 (www.wartimeallies.co)
  39. ^ 43,000 Afghans (www.nytimes.com)
  40. ^ which cost $575 each (www.voanews.com)
  41. ^ 170 (www.nytimes.com)
  42. ^ American University of Kabul (www.cbsnews.com)
  43. ^ separated (www.inquirer.com)
  44. ^ hopes of resettlement (www.nytimes.com)
  45. ^ Afghans for a Better Tomorrow (www.weareafghans.org)
  46. ^ Sign up for Politics Weekly (memberservices.theconversation.com)

Authors: Tazreena Sajjad, Senior Professorial Lecturer of Global Governance, Politics and Security, American University School of International Service

Read more https://theconversation.com/afghan-evacuees-lack-a-clear-path-for-resettlement-in-the-u-s-7-months-after-taliban-takeover-176945

Metropolitan republishes selected articles from The Conversation USA with permission

Visit The Conversation to see more