.

  • Written by Christopher Michaelson, Professor of Ethics and Business Law, University of St. Thomas

Has Davos lost its mojo?

After U.S. President Donald Trump, U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May and other world leaders nixed plans to attend[1] the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Switzerland, some began to claim “Davos is in decline[2].”

I take the opposite view. Having been there[3] in the past as part of a participant’s supporting staff – condescendingly referred to by status-conscious attendees[4] as a “sherpa”[5] – I have seen up close how much can be accomplished by a handful of people sitting in a room and talking.

As a philosopher and business ethicist[6], I believe it’s worth remembering some of the history that’s been made in that rarefied Alpine air and why Davos still matters today.

Why the Davos elites are still relevant Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres shake hands at Davos in 2001, their second meeting at the forum. AP Photo/Michel Euler[7]

The stated aim of the World Economic Forum – which we commonly refer to by the name of the ski resort in the Swiss Alps where it is held – is “improving the state of the world[8].”

It does this by promoting global collaboration[9], capitalism that includes many stakeholders[10] and public-private cooperation[11].

Numerous international agreements and breakthroughs have emerged from Davos. Examples include preventing war[12] between Turkey and Greece in the 1980s and helping resolve the eurozone’s debt crisis[13] in 2012 – the year I was last there. It brought together world leaders as oppositional as South Africa’s Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk[14] in 1992 and Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres[15] in 1994 and 2001.

Why the Davos elites are still relevant Prince William and Sir David Attenborough watch the latter’s new documentary ‘Our Planet.’ AP Photo/Markus Schreiber[16]

But Davos doesn’t need to make a breakthrough in an ancient conflict to be effective. Its theme this year, “Globalization 4.0[17],” served as an important rebuke to the nationalists emerging[18] in the world today who have shown a disdain for multilateralism[19] and a preference for confrontation over cooperation[20].

And in fact, most[21] of the sessions[22] focused[23], as I believe they should, on finding cooperative ways[24] to solve the world’s pressing problems.

And the world has many to deal with[25], from worsening economic inequality and climate change to the growing scarcity of water. All were discussed[26] at Davos this year.

Were any breakthroughs made? Maybe not.

Davos cannot realistically be expected to solve the world’s problems in less than a week each year. But despite its elite reputation, I believe it helps direct attention toward actually making the world better for everyone – and not just the elites in the audience.

References

  1. ^ nixed plans to attend (www.ft.com)
  2. ^ Davos is in decline (www.washingtonpost.com)
  3. ^ Having been there (www.huffingtonpost.com)
  4. ^ status-conscious attendees (www.weforum.org)
  5. ^ as a “sherpa” (www.weforum.org)
  6. ^ philosopher and business ethicist (www.stthomas.edu)
  7. ^ AP Photo/Michel Euler (www.apimages.com)
  8. ^ improving the state of the world (www.weforum.org)
  9. ^ global collaboration (www3.weforum.org)
  10. ^ capitalism that includes many stakeholders (www.foreignaffairs.com)
  11. ^ public-private cooperation (www.weforum.org)
  12. ^ preventing war (www.bbc.com)
  13. ^ helping resolve the eurozone’s debt crisis (www.nytimes.com)
  14. ^ Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk (www.flickr.com)
  15. ^ Yasser Arafat and Shimon Peres (www.dailyherald.com)
  16. ^ AP Photo/Markus Schreiber (www.apimages.com)
  17. ^ Globalization 4.0 (www.iafrica.com)
  18. ^ nationalists emerging (theconversation.com)
  19. ^ disdain for multilateralism (www.msnbc.com)
  20. ^ confrontation over cooperation (www.usnews.com)
  21. ^ most (www.cnn.com)
  22. ^ sessions (www.nytimes.com)
  23. ^ focused (www.ft.com)
  24. ^ finding cooperative ways (www.weforum.org)
  25. ^ has many to deal with (www.reuters.com)
  26. ^ All were discussed (www.weforum.org)

Authors: Christopher Michaelson, Professor of Ethics and Business Law, University of St. Thomas

Read more http://theconversation.com/why-the-davos-elites-are-still-relevant-110411

Metropolitan republishes selected articles from The Conversation USA with permission

Visit The Conversation to see more