In a closely divided Congress, aging lawmakers are a problem for Democrats
- Written by Charlie Hunt, Associate Professor of Political Science, Boise State University
The 2026 midterms are more than a year away, but some high-profile primary election battles in the Democratic Party are gaining national attention. Much of that attention is focused on the age of the candidates.
Thanks to Texas’ proposed mid-decade redistricting[1], a showdown is looming between two Democrats serving in the U.S. House of Representatives from that state: 36-year-old Rep. Greg Casar has made clear his intention to run against a colleague[2], Rep. Lloyd Doggett, despite Doggett’s public pressure on Casar[3] to run in a different district. Doggett is 78 years old and has served in the House since 1994.
An even more stark generational divide has emerged in New York’s 12th district, where 26-year-old political organizer Liam Elkind is making a similar challenge in a Democratic primary[4]. The 18-term incumbent in that race, Rep. Jerry Nadler[5], will be 79 years old by next year’s midterm election. He began his political career as a New York state assemblyman in 1977 — more than 20 years before Elkind was born.
These generational matchups have become common in the Democratic Party. They have also gained significant attention, particularly since the 2018 upset[6] of another veteran Democratic leader, Rep. Joe Crowley of New York, in a primary challenge from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who was 28 at the time.
Organizer Liam Elkind announces his candidacy for Congress in New York’s 12th District.These challengers often criticize the seniority of older lawmakers. They say seniority is not a benefit but a hindrance to effective representation because the longtime incumbents are out of touch with the needs of their districts and the country, and that remaining in office crowds out crucial younger perspectives[7].
As generational challenges have become more common, they’ve also become sharper in their explicit appeals to age as a key candidate quality. And candidates like Elkind have made the argument that the stakes go beyond generational “vibes.”
A geriatric Congress can also have demonstrable effects on the policymaking that happens on Capitol Hill.
Slim majorities make age a bigger issue
Why is candidate age so prominent in the current election cycle?
One big reason is that razor-thin majorities in Congress[8] make every seat count.
Slim margins create legislative and institutional uncertainty that has very real consequences for how Congress is run and how policy gets made.
In his candidacy announcement video[9], Elkind makes this point explicitly: “In the last five months, three House Democrats passed away, allowing Trump’s billionaire bill, gutting health care and food stamps for millions of people, to go through by one vote.”
Although it’s likely that Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” would have passed even without these vacancies[10], the Democratic absences undoubtedly made Speaker Mike Johnson’s job of passing the bill a little bit easier.
Elkind also notes that the last eight members of Congress who passed away in office were Democrats[11]. In essence, Elkind is arguing that Democrats must elect more young members not just as a matter of representation but as a way of preserving power in Congress.
How do vacancies occur?
Seat vacancies caused by the early departures of members of Congress happen regularly, and in a variety of ways.
The 118th Congress, which met from Jan. 3, 2023, to Jan. 3, 2025, set a modern record with 17 vacancies, a rate unmatched going back to the 1950s. This was partly because of four member deaths, including Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas[12].
Other high-profile vacancies in the 118th Congress were due to different causes. Some members were forced to resign or even expelled from Congress because of scandal, like GOP Rep. George Santos of New York, who was convicted in 2024 for a range of crimes and subsequently sentenced to several years in prison[13].
Others cut short their current term due to political defeats: House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a Republican from California, resigned after being ousted from his leadership post in 2023[14]. The current 119th Congress has seen additional resignations[15] from members who took positions in the second Trump administration.
Resignation is the most common reason for departure in recent Congresses. However, at least one member – and often more than one – has died in all but one Congress in the past 70 years. The number of deaths that regularly occur among members is more than sufficient to change how the majority party functions in a closely contested Congress like this one.
And for Democrats[16], three member deaths in the first nine months of the current Congress is far ahead of previous years’ paces, making incumbents’ advanced age a relevant issue on the campaign trail.
How are vacancies filled?
Although U.S. Senate vacancies are often – though not always – filled through an appointment by the governor of that state[17], the Constitution mandates that House vacancies be filled by special elections[18] scheduled by the governor.
These elections usually happen within a few months of the vacancy. What this means is that there are real possibilities for the size of a party’s majority to shrink, or grow, between election years, in ways that have profound impacts on policymaking. And even if a majority party shift doesn’t happen, a district could still replace a moderate departing representative with an extremist, or vice versa.
Former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, a Republican, announced his resignation from Congress in December 2023.What does this mean for the 2026 midterms?
Whether younger candidates’ message will resonate with primary election voters remains an open question. Longer-serving incumbents hold major advantages[19] like deeper campaign experience. Younger candidates traditionally lack the name recognition and donor bases that older incumbents have built up over decades.
But given the public concern over the high-profile declines of candidates for president – like former President Joe Biden[20] – and for Congress, like Sens. Dianne Feinstein[21] and Mitch McConnell[22], generational politics may be more important than ever, and help reverse this trend.
This story contains material from a previous article[23] published on Jan. 3, 2023.
References
- ^ mid-decade redistricting (theconversation.com)
- ^ to run against a colleague (www.washingtonexaminer.com)
- ^ Doggett’s public pressure on Casar (www.politico.com)
- ^ making a similar challenge in a Democratic primary (punchbowl.news)
- ^ Rep. Jerry Nadler (nadler.house.gov)
- ^ 2018 upset (www.nytimes.com)
- ^ crowds out crucial younger perspectives (www.politico.com)
- ^ razor-thin majorities in Congress (history.house.gov)
- ^ candidacy announcement video (www.youtube.com)
- ^ would have passed even without these vacancies (theconversation.com)
- ^ the last eight members of Congress who passed away in office were Democrats (rollcall.com)
- ^ deaths, including Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas (www.adn.com)
- ^ sentenced to several years in prison (www.justice.gov)
- ^ ousted from his leadership post in 2023 (apnews.com)
- ^ additional resignations (history.house.gov)
- ^ And for Democrats (rollcall.com)
- ^ filled through an appointment by the governor of that state (www.ncsl.org)
- ^ Constitution mandates that House vacancies be filled by special elections (www.everycrsreport.com)
- ^ hold major advantages (theconversation.com)
- ^ Joe Biden (abcnews.go.com)
- ^ Dianne Feinstein (www.npr.org)
- ^ Mitch McConnell (www.politico.com)
- ^ a previous article (theconversation.com)
Authors: Charlie Hunt, Associate Professor of Political Science, Boise State University
