Profits over patients: For-profit nursing home chains are draining resources from care while shifting huge sums to owners’ pockets

The care at Landmark of Louisville Rehabilitation and Nursing was abysmal when state inspectors filed their survey report of the Kentucky facility on July 3, 2021.

Residents wandered the halls^[1] in a facility that can house up to 250 people, yelling at each other and stealing blankets. One resident beat a roommate with a stick^[2], causing bruising and skin tears. Another was found in bed with a broken finger and a bloody forehead gash^[3]. That person was allowed to roam and enter the beds of other residents. In another case, there was sexual touching^[4] in the dayroom between residents, according to the report.

Meals were served from filthy meal carts on plastic foam trays, and residents struggled to cut their food with dull plastic cutlery. Broken tiles lined showers, and a mysterious black gunk marred the floors. The director of housekeeping reported that the dining room was unsanitary. Overall, there was a critical lack of training, staff and supervision^[5].

The inspectors tagged Landmark as deficient in 29 areas^[6], including six that put residents in immediate jeopardy of serious harm and three where actual harm was found. The issues were so severe that the government slapped Landmark with a fine of over US$319,000^[7] − more than 29 times the average^[8] for a nursing home in 2021 − and suspended payments to the home from federal Medicaid and Medicare funds.

But problems persisted. Five months later, inspectors levied six additional deficiencies of immediate jeopardy − the highest level.

Landmark is just one of the 58 facilities run by parent company Infinity Healthcare Management across five states. The government issued penalties to the company almost 4½ times the national average, according to bimonthly data that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services first started to make available in late 2022. All told, Infinity paid nearly $10 million in fines^[9] since 2021, the highest among nursing home chains with fewer than 100 facilities.

Infinity Healthcare Management and its executives did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Race to the bottom

Such sanctions are nothing new^[10] for Infinity or other for-profit nursing home chains that have dominated an industry long known for cutting corners in pursuit of profits for private owners. But this race to the bottom to extract profits is accelerating, despite demands by government officials^[11], health care experts and advocacy groups to protect the nation’s most vulnerable citizens.

To uncover the reasons why, The Conversation delved into the nursing home industry, where for-profit facilities make up more than 72% of the nation’s nearly 14,900 facilities. The probe, which paired an academic expert with an investigative reporter, used the most recent government data on ownership, facility information and penalties, combined with CMS data on affiliated entities^[12] for nursing homes.

The investigation revealed an industry that places a premium on cost cutting and big profits, with low staffing and poor quality, often to the detriment of patient well-being. Operating under weak and poorly enforced regulations^[13] with financially insignificant penalties, the for-profit sector fosters an environment where corners are frequently cut, compromising the quality of care and endangering patient health.

Meanwhile, owners make the facilities look less profitable by siphoning money from the homes through byzantine networks of interconnected corporations. Federal regulators have neglected the problem as each year likely billions of dollars are funneled^[14] out of nursing homes through related parties and into owners’ pockets.

More trouble at midsize

Analyzing newly released government data^[15], our investigation found that these problems are most pronounced in nursing homes like Infinity − midsize chains that operate between 11 and 100 facilities^[16]. This subsection of the industry has higher average fines per home, lower overall quality ratings, and are more likely to be tagged with resident abuse compared with both the larger and smaller networks. Indeed, while such chains account for about 39% of all facilities, they operate 11 of the 15 most-fined facilities.

With few impediments, private investors who own the midsize chains have swooped in to purchase underperforming homes, expanding their holdings even as larger chains divest and close facilities.

“They are really bad, but the names − we don’t know these names,” said Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, a nonprofit law organization.

In response to The Conversation’s findings on nursing homes and request for an interview, a CMS spokesperson emailed a statement^[17] that said the CMS is “unwavering in its commitment to improve safety and quality of care for the more than 1.2 million residents receiving care in Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing homes.”

“We support transparency and accountability,” the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living, a trade organization representing the nursing home industry, wrote in response^[18] to The Conversation‘s request for comment. “But neither ownership nor line items on a budget sheet prove whether a nursing home is committed to its residents.”

Ripe for abuse

It often takes years to improve a poor nursing home − or run one into the ground^[19]. The analysis of midsize chains shows that most owners have been associated with their current facilities for less than eight years, making it difficult to separate operators who have taken long-term investments in resident care from those who are looking to quickly extract money and resources before closing them down or moving on^[20]. These chains control roughly 41% of nursing home beds in the U.S., according to CMS’s provider data, making the lack of transparency especially ripe for abuse.

A churn of nursing home purchases even during the pandemic shows that investors view the sector as highly profitable^[21], especially when staffing costs are kept low and fines for poor care can easily be covered by the money extracted from residents, their families and taxpayers.

A March 2024 study from Lehigh University and the University of California, Los Angeles also shows that costs were inflated^[22] when nursing home owners switched to contractors they controlled directly or indirectly. Overall, spending on real estate increased 20.4% and spending on management increased 24.6% when the businesses were affiliated, the research showed.

“This is the model of their care: They come in, they understaff and they make their money,” said Sam Brooks, director of public policy at the Consumer Voice, a national resident advocacy organization. “Then they multiply it over a series of different facilities.”

This is a condensed version of an article from The Conversation’s investigative unit^[23]. To find out more about the rise of for-profit nursing homes, financial trickery and what could make the nation’s most vulnerable citizens safer, read the complete version^[24].

References

1. ^{^} wandered the halls (www.documentcloud.org)
2. ^{^} with a stick (www.documentcloud.org)
3. ^{^} gash (www.documentcloud.org)
4. ^{^} sexual touching (www.documentcloud.org)
5. ^{^} supervision (projects.propublica.org)
6. ^{^} deficient in 29 areas (medicare.gov)
7. ^{^} a fine of over US$319,000 (www.medicare.gov)
8. ^{^} more than 29 times the average (data.cms.gov)
9. ^{^} nearly $10 million in fines (data.cms.gov)
10. ^{^} sanctions are nothing new (violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org)
11. ^{^} government officials (www.gao.gov)
12. ^{^} CMS data on affiliated entities (data.cms.gov)
13. ^{^} weak and poorly enforced regulations (dx.doi.org)
14. ^{^} each year likely billions of dollars are funneled (theconsumervoice.org)
15. ^{^} newly released government data (data.cms.gov)
16. ^{^} operate between 11 and 100 facilities (data.cms.gov)
17. ^{^} a statement (www.documentcloud.org)
18. ^{^} wrote in response (www.documentcloud.org)
19. ^{^} run one into the ground (www.newyorker.com)
20. ^{^} before closing them down or moving on (www.wpr.org)
21. ^{^} highly profitable (doi.org)
22. ^{^} shows that costs were inflated (ucla.app.box.com)
23. ^{^} investigative unit (theconversation.com)
24. ^{^} read the complete version (theconversation.com)