Why is Russia sending oil and gas workers to fight in Ukraine? It may signal more energy cutoffs ahead
- Written by Amy Myers Jaffe, Research professor, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University
Russia’s effort to conscript 300,000 reservists to counter Ukraine’s military advances in Kharkiv has drawn a lot of attention from military[1] and political[2] analysts. But there’s also a potential energy angle.
In its call for reservists, Russia’s leadership specifically targeted oil and gas workers[3] for the draft. One might assume that energy workers, who provide fuel and export revenue that Russia desperately needs, are too valuable to the war effort to be conscripted. But this surprising move[4] follows escalating energy conflicts between Russia and Europe.
The explosions in September 2022[5] that damaged the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines from Russia to Europe, and that may have been sabotage[6], are just the latest developments in this complex and unstable arena. As an analyst of global energy policy[7], I expect that more energy cutoffs could be in the cards – either directly ordered by the Kremlin to escalate economic pressure on European governments or as a result of new sabotage, or even because shortages of trained Russian manpower as a result of conscription lead to accidents or stoppages.
Dwindling natural gas flows
Russia has significantly reduced natural gas shipments to Europe in an effort to pressure European nations who are siding with Ukraine. In May 2022, the state-owned energy company Gazprom closed a key pipeline[8] that runs through Belarus and Poland.
In June, the company reduced shipments to Germany via the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which has a capacity of 170 million cubic meters per day, to only 40 million cubic meters per day. A few months later, Gazprom announced that Nord Stream 1 needed repairs and shut it down completely[9]. Now U.S. and European leaders charge that Russia deliberately damaged the pipeline[10] to further disrupt European energy supplies. The timing of the pipeline explosion coincided with the start up of a major new natural gas pipeline from Norway to Poland[11].
Russia has very limited alternative export infrastructure that can move Siberian natural gas to other customers, like China[12], so most of the gas it would normally be selling to Europe cannot be shifted to other markets. Natural gas wells in Siberia may need to be taken out of production, or shut in[13], in energy-speak, which could free up workers for conscription.
European dependence on Russian oil and gas evolved over decades. Now, reducing it is posing hard choices for EU countries.Restricting Russian oil profits
Russia’s call-up of reservists also includes workers from companies specifically focused on oil. This has led some seasoned analysts to question whether supply disruptions might spread to oil[14], either by accident or on purpose.
One potential trigger is the Dec. 5, 2022, deadline for the start of phase six of European Union energy sanctions against Russia[15]. Confusion about the package of restrictions and how they will relate to a cap on what buyers will pay for Russian crude oil has muted market volatility so far. But when the measures go into effect, they could initiate a new spike in oil prices.
Under this sanctions package, Europe will completely stop buying seaborne Russian crude oil. This step isn’t as damaging as it sounds, since many buyers in Europe have already shifted to alternative oil sources.
Before Russia invaded Ukraine, it exported roughly 1.4 million barrels per day of crude oil to Europe by sea, divided between Black Sea and Baltic routes. In recent months, European purchases have fallen below 1 million barrels per day. But Russia has actually been able to increase total flows from Black Sea and Baltic ports by redirecting crude oil exports to China, India and Turkey[16].
Russia has limited access to tankers, insurance and other services associated with moving oil by ship. Until recently, it acquired such services mainly from Europe. The change means that customers like China, India and Turkey have to transfer some of their purchases of Russian oil at sea[17] from Russian-owned or chartered ships to ships sailing under other nations’ flags, whose services might not be covered by the European bans. This process is common and not always illegal, but often is used to evade sanctions by obscuring where shipments from Russia are ending up.
To compensate for this costly process, Russia is discounting its exports by US$40 per barrel. Observers generally assume that whatever Russian crude oil European buyers relinquish this winter will gradually find alternative outlets.
Where is Russian oil going?
The U.S. and its European allies aim to discourage this increased outflow of Russian crude by further limiting Moscow’s access to maritime services, such as tanker chartering, insurance and pilots licensed and trained to handle oil tankers[18], for any crude oil exports to third parties outside of the G-7 who pay rates above the U.S.-EU price cap. In my view, it will be relatively easy to game this policy and obscure how much Russia’s customers are paying.
On Sept. 9, 2022, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued new guidance[19] for the Dec. 5 sanctions regime. The policy aims to limit the revenue Russia can earn from its oil while keeping it flowing. It requires that unless buyers of Russian oil can certify that oil cargoes were bought for reduced prices, they will be barred from obtaining European maritime services.
However, this new strategy seems to be failing even before it begins. Denmark is still making Danish pilots available[20] to move tankers through its precarious straits, which are a vital conduit for shipments of Russian crude and refined products. Russia has also found oil tankers that aren’t subject to European oversight to move over a third of the volume[21] that it needs transported, and it will likely obtain more.
Traders have been getting around these sorts of oil sanctions for decades[22]. Tricks of the trade include blending banned oil into other kinds of oil, turning off ship transponders to avoid detection of ship-to-ship transfers, falsifying documentation and delivering oil into and then later out of major storage hubs in remote parts of the globe. This explains why markets have been sanguine about the looming European sanctions deadline.
One fuel at a time
But Russian President Vladimir Putin may have other ideas. Putin has already threatened[23] a larger oil cutoff if the G-7 tries to impose its price cap, warning that Europe will be “as frozen as a wolf’s tail[24],” referencing a Russian fairy tale.
U.S. officials are counting on the idea that Russia won’t want to damage its oil fields[25] by turning off the taps, which in some cases might create long-term field pressurization problems. In my view, this is poor logic for multiple reasons, including Putin’s proclivity to sacrifice Russia’s economic future for geopolitical goals.
Russia managed to easily throttle back oil production when the COVID-19 pandemic destroyed world oil demand temporarily in 2020, and cutoffs of Russian natural gas exports to Europe have already greatly compromised Gazprom’s commercial future[27]. Such actions show that commercial considerations are not a high priority in the Kremlin’s calculus.
How much oil would come off the market if Putin escalates his energy war? It’s an open question. Global oil demand has fallen sharply in recent months amid high prices and recessionary pressures. The potential loss of 1 million barrels per day of Russian crude oil shipments to Europe is unlikely to jack the price of oil back up the way it did initially in February 2022, when demand was still robust.
Speculators are betting that Putin will want to keep oil flowing to everyone else. China’s Russian crude imports surged as high as 2 million barrels per day following the Ukraine invasion, and India and Turkey[28] are buying significant quantities.
Refined products like diesel fuel are due for further EU sanctions in February 2023. Russia supplies close to 40% of Europe’s diesel fuel at present, so that remains a significant economic lever.
The EU appears to know it must kick dependence on Russian energy completely, but its protected, one-product-at-a-time approach keeps Putin potentially in the driver’s seat. In the U.S., local diesel fuel prices are highly influenced by competition for seaborne cargoes from European buyers. So U.S. East Coast importers could also be in for a bumpy winter.
References
- ^ military (breakingdefense.com)
- ^ political (www.csis.org)
- ^ targeted oil and gas workers (thebarentsobserver.com)
- ^ surprising move (oilprice.com)
- ^ explosions in September 2022 (www.npr.org)
- ^ may have been sabotage (www.washingtonpost.com)
- ^ analyst of global energy policy (fletcher.tufts.edu)
- ^ closed a key pipeline (www.themoscowtimes.com)
- ^ shut it down completely (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ deliberately damaged the pipeline (www.washingtonpost.com)
- ^ major new natural gas pipeline from Norway to Poland (www.ft.com)
- ^ that can move Siberian natural gas to other customers, like China (www.politico.eu)
- ^ shut in (www.pecantreeog.com)
- ^ supply disruptions might spread to oil (www.brookings.edu)
- ^ phase six of European Union energy sanctions against Russia (ec.europa.eu)
- ^ China, India and Turkey (asia.nikkei.com)
- ^ transfer some of their purchases of Russian oil at sea (www.spglobal.com)
- ^ licensed and trained to handle oil tankers (www.transmountain.com)
- ^ new guidance (www.clearytradewatch.com)
- ^ is still making Danish pilots available (www.bloomberg.com)
- ^ over a third of the volume (www.brookings.edu)
- ^ for decades (www.spglobal.com)
- ^ threatened (www.reuters.com)
- ^ as frozen as a wolf’s tail (www.thedailybeast.com)
- ^ damage its oil fields (www.brookings.edu)
- ^ Thierry Monasse/Getty Images (www.gettyimages.com)
- ^ compromised Gazprom’s commercial future (www.politico.eu)
- ^ India and Turkey (www.spglobal.com)
Authors: Amy Myers Jaffe, Research professor, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University
