Metropolitan Digital

Men's Weekly


.

Why Jimmy Kimmel’s First Amendment rights weren’t violated – but ABC’s would be protected if it stood up to the FCC and Trump

  • Written by Wayne Unger, Associate Professor of Law, Quinnipiac University
Why Jimmy Kimmel’s First Amendment rights weren’t violated – but ABC’s would be protected if it stood up to the FCC and TrumpA crowd protests in Hollywood, Calif., on Sept. 18, 2025, after the suspension of the 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' taping earlier in the day. David Pashaee / Middle East Images via AFP, Getty Images

The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has sparked a wave of political commentary.

There were the respectful and sincere comments condemning...

Read more: Why Jimmy Kimmel’s First Amendment rights weren’t violated – but ABC’s would be protected if it...

More Articles ...

  1. Palestinian statehood is winning major new supporters at UN – but symbolic action won’t make it happen
  2. Hepatitis B shot for newborns has nearly eliminated childhood infections with this virus in the US
  3. Naming and categorizing objects is part of how young kids develop executive function skills – new research
  4. Suicide-by-chatbot puts Big Tech in the product liability hot seat
  5. Antisemitism on campus is a real problem − but headlines and government-proposed solutions don’t match the experience of most Jewish students
  6. New website tracks how Pennsylvania’s $2.2B in opioid settlement funds is being spent
  7. The president as partisan warrior: Trump’s rejection of traditional presidential statesmanship
  8. More Americans meet criteria for high blood pressure under new guidelines
  9. Nuclear in your backyard? Tiny reactors could one day power towns and campuses – but community input will be key
  10. US touts collaborative plan to tackle Mexico’s drug cartels – but initiative is met with denial and mistrust south of the border
Metropolitan republishes selected articles from The Conversation USA with permission

Visit The Conversation to see more