Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes
- Written by Valerie M. Fridland, Professor of Linguistics, University of Nevada, Reno
As a linguistics professor[1], I’m often asked why English is decaying before our eyes, whether it’s “like” being used promiscuously[2], t’s being dropped deleteriously[3] or “literally” being deployed nonliterally[4].
While these common gripes point to eccentric speech patterns, they don’t point to grammatical annihilation. English has weathered far worse.
Let’s start with something we can all agree on: Old English[5], spoken from approximately A.D. 450 to 1100, is pretty unintelligible to us today. Anyone who’s had the pleasure of reading “Beowulf[6]” in high school knows how different English back then used to sound. Word endings did a lot more grammatical work, and verbs followed more complicated patterns. Remnants of those rules fuel lingering debates today, such as when to use “whom” over “who,” and whether the past tense of “sneak” is “snuck” or “sneaked[7].”
The language went on to experience centuries of tumult: Viking invasions, which introduced Old Norse influence[8]; Anglo-Norman French rule, which shifted the language[9] of the elite to French; and 18th-Century grammarians[10], who dictated norms with their elocution and grammar guides.
In that time, English has lost almost all of the more complex linguistic trappings it was born with to become the language we know and – at least, sometimes – love today. And as I explain in my new book, “Why We Talk Funny: The Real Story Behind Our Accents[11],” it was all thanks to the way that language naturally evolves to meet the social needs of its speakers.
From dropping the ‘l’ to dropping the ‘g’
The things we tend to label as “bad” or sloppy English – for instance, the “g” that gets lost from our -ing endings or the deletion of a “t” when we say a word like “innernet” – actually reflect speech habits that are centuries old.
Take, for example, “often.” Originally spoken with the “t[12],” that pronunciation gradually became less favored around the 15th century, alongside that “l” in “talk” and the “k” in know. Meanwhile, the “s” now stuck on the back of verbs like “does” and “makes” began as a dialectal variant that only became popular in 16th-century London[13]. It gradually replaced “th” whenever third persons were involved, as in “The lady doth protest too much[14].”
While dropping the “l” in talk may have been initially frowned upon, today it would be strange if you pronounced the letter. And the shift makes sense: It smoothed out some linguistic awkwardness for the sake of efficiency.
If people learned to look at language more like linguists, they might come around to seeing that there is more than one perspective on what good speech consists of.
And yes, that absolutely is a sentence ending with a preposition – something many modern grammar guides discourage, even though the idea only took hold after 18th-century grammarian Robert Lowth[15] intimated it was a less elegant choice based on the model of Latin.
Though Lowth voiced no hard and fast rule[16] against it, many a grammar maven later misconstrued his advice as an admonition. Just like that, a mere suggestion became grammatical law.
The rise of the grammar sticklers
Many of today’s ideas about what constitutes correct English are based on a singular – often mistaken – 19th-century view of the forces that govern our language.
In the late 18th century, the English-speaking world began experiencing class restructuring and higher literacy rates[17]. As greater class mobility became possible, accent differences became class markers[18] that separated new money from old money.
Emulation of upper-crust speech norms became popular among the nouveau riche. With literacy also on the rise, grammarians and elocutionists raced to dictate the terms of “proper” English on and off the page, which led to the rise of usage guides and dictionaries[19] that were eager to sell a certain brand of speech[20].
Another example of grammarian angst reconfiguring the view of an otherwise perfectly fine form is the droppin’ of the “g.” It became so tied to slovenly speech that it was branded with an apostrophe in the 19th century[21] to make sure no one missed its lackadaisical and nonstandard nature.
Up until the 19th century, however, no one seemed to care whether one pronounced it as “-in” or “-ing.”
In fact, evidence suggests that -ing wasn’t even heard as the correct form. Many elocution guides from the 18th century provide rhyming word pairs like “herring/heron,” “coughing/coffin” and “jerking/jerkin,” which suggest that “-in” may have been the preferred pronunciation of words ending with “-ing.” Even writer and satirist Jonathan Swift – a frequent lobbyist for “proper” English – rhymes “brewing” with “ruin” in his 1731 poem “Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift, D.S.P.D.[22].”
Embrace the change
Language has always shifted and evolved. People often bristle at changes from what they’ve known to what is new. And maybe that’s because this process often begins with speakers that society usually looks less favorably on[23]: the young, the female, the poor, the nonwhite.
But it’s important to remember that being disliked and bad are not the same thing – that today’s speech pariahs are driven by the same linguistic and social needs as the Londoners who started going with “does” instead of “doth” or dropped the “t” in often.
So if you think the speech that comes from your lips is the “correct” version, think again. Thou, like every other English speaker, art literally the product of centuries of linguistic reinvention.
References
- ^ linguistics professor (www.valeriefridland.com)
- ^ used promiscuously (www.entrepreneur.com)
- ^ t’s being dropped deleteriously (www.quickanddirtytips.com)
- ^ deployed nonliterally (theconversation.com)
- ^ Old English (lrc.la.utexas.edu)
- ^ Beowulf (www.poetryfoundation.org)
- ^ “snuck” or “sneaked (www.merriam-webster.com)
- ^ Old Norse influence (blogs.ncl.ac.uk)
- ^ shifted the language (www.merriam-webster.com)
- ^ 18th-Century grammarians (ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub)
- ^ Why We Talk Funny: The Real Story Behind Our Accents (www.penguinrandomhouse.com)
- ^ Originally spoken with the “t (www.merriam-webster.com)
- ^ popular in 16th-century London (www.jstor.org)
- ^ The lady doth protest too much (myshakespeare.me)
- ^ Robert Lowth (www.gutenberg.org)
- ^ voiced no hard and fast rule (www.let.leidenuniv.nl)
- ^ class restructuring and higher literacy rates (ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub)
- ^ accent differences became class markers (archive.org)
- ^ guides and dictionaries (johnsonsdictionaryonline.com)
- ^ sell a certain brand of speech (archive.org)
- ^ branded with an apostrophe in the 19th century (repository.upenn.edu)
- ^ Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift, D.S.P.D. (www.poetryfoundation.org)
- ^ speakers that society usually looks less favorably on (lithub.com)
Authors: Valerie M. Fridland, Professor of Linguistics, University of Nevada, Reno